Telepathic Hemispheric Influence: The Devil on the Left Shoulder, the Angel on the Right, and the Hidden Hand of Reptilian/Demonic Entities in Human Behavioral Control – A Face Value Analysis
Abstract Building directly upon the Face Value Approach established in War Against The Aliens: How to Win It and the preceding analysis of reptilian influence in modern UFOlogy and historic demonology, this paper examines the longstanding cultural trope of the “devil on one shoulder and angel on the other” through the lens of hemispheric specialization, telepathic communication, and ultra-low-frequency (ULF) electromagnetic phenomena. Drawing on Julian Jaynes’ bicameral mind theory, Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory data on consciousness-mediated non-local effects, peer-reviewed telepathy research, and thousands of independent abduction/demonic encounter reports, we postulate that reptilian/demonic entities—identified via convergent patterns as the dominant non-human intelligence—engage in targeted telepathic influence.
Such entities preferentially direct “devilish” (tempting, rationalizing, anti-human) suggestions to the left hemisphere and “angelic” (intuitive, moral) counter-suggestions to the right, operating alongside physical/plasmic manifestations. This mechanism provides a coherent explanation for the documented shift toward anti-human behaviors in postmodern society, particularly among elites, and supports the hypothesis of a deliberate hidden hand driving societal division, materialism, and moral erosion. Face Value cross-verification elevates this to a high-probability operational reality, with direct strategic implications for resistance.
Introduction The Face Value Approach—accepting raw eyewitness, historical, and experiential data without premature pathologization—has already revealed a millennia-spanning pattern of reptilian entity infiltration, hybridization, and control. This paper extends that framework to the internal realm: the apparent “voices” guiding human decision-making. The ubiquitous cultural archetype of a devil whispering temptation on one shoulder and an angel offering conscience on the other is not mere metaphor. When examined through neuroscientific, parapsychological, and ufological/demonological lenses, and grounded in its rich historical context, it maps onto hemispheric differences and telepathic mechanisms plausibly employed by the same reptilian/demonic intelligences catalogued previously. Evidence from PEAR lab experiments, modern abduction reports, and historic demonology converges on real-time behavioral influence—beyond mere physical apparitions—suggesting a sophisticated mind-control apparatus. This hidden hand may explain the accelerated anti-human turn in postmodern behaviors: rampant individualism, ethical relativism, elite detachment, and societal fragmentation. Recognition is the first step toward countermeasures in the War Against The Aliens.
Historical and Cultural Reference: The Devil and Angel on the Shoulders The trope of the shoulder angel and shoulder devil is a well-established plot device in fiction, particularly animation and comics, used to dramatize a character’s inner moral conflict. The angel represents conscience and good guidance, while the devil embodies temptation and self-interest. This convention visually externalizes the dual influences on decision-making.
Its roots run deep into early Christian and broader ancient traditions. 
One of the earliest explicit references appears in the non-canonical early Christian text The Shepherd of Hermas (c. 140–150 CE): “There are two angels with a man—one of righteousness, and the other of iniquity.” These angels descend into a person’s heart to guide emotions and choices; the text instructs to trust only the Angel of Righteousness. This concept parallels ideas of personal tutelary spirits common in many ancient cultures.
In ancient Judaism, the midrash Genesis Rabbah (65:19) describes God assigning “two angels, one on his right and one on his left” to support Isaac during Jacob’s deception, holding him up by the elbows. Early Christian theologian Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–253 CE), in his Homily 12 on Luke, elaborated: “To every one there are two attending angels, the one of justice and the other of wickedness. If there be good thoughts in our heart… an angel of the Lord is speaking to us. If, however, the thoughts of our heart be turned to evil, an angel of the devil is speaking to us.”
The motif evolved through medieval Christian folklore and drama. In popular medieval plays such as the 15th-century The Castle of Perseverance, angels and devils compete for the soul’s allegiance. Christopher Marlowe’s The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus (c. 1592) features a “Good Angel” and “Bad Angel” offering competing advice to the protagonist. Christian folklore often paired a dedicated guardian angel (preventing physical and moral harm) with tempting devils (not always singular or person-specific) that introduce sinful ideas. Both were believed capable of accessing thoughts and influencing the heart.
The specific “shoulder” imagery likely emerged as a visual shorthand in folk belief and later artistic/literary depictions, with the right side traditionally associated with good/righteousness (“right hand of God”) and the left with sinister/temptation (etymology of “sinister” from Latin for left). Similar dual-spirit concepts appear in ancient Greek ideas of divided souls, Islamic traditions of recording angels (kiraman katibin) on either side, and broader cross-cultural motifs of internal moral struggle (psychomachia). In modern popular culture, the trope became iconic through cartoons, films, and comics as a humorous yet profound illustration of conscience versus temptation.
Face Value treats these historical accounts not as psychological projections but as literal descriptions of perceived external telepathic input—consistent with abduction accounts where entities communicate directly into the mind.
Neuroscientific Foundations: Hemispheric Specialization and Bicameral Echoes Contemporary neuroscience demonstrates clear left-right hemispheric asymmetries. The left hemisphere dominates analytical, linguistic, logical, and sequential processing—ideal for rationalizing self-interest or moral compromise. The right hemisphere excels in holistic intuition, emotional context, creativity, and moral-empathic awareness. Julian Jaynes’ bicameral mind theory posits that pre-conscious humans experienced right-hemisphere-generated auditory hallucinations (divine “voices”) interpreted by the left as external commands; consciousness arose only after cultural breakdown integrated the hemispheres into unified self-narration. While Jaynes’ timeline is debated, the mechanism persists in vestigial form: stress, fatigue, or altered states can reactivate “voice-like” internal dialogue.
In the framing aligned with historical shoulder traditions (devil to left hemisphere, angel to right), reptilian/demonic entities could exploit this:
- Left-hemisphere targeting (“devil”): Logical rationalizations for anti-human acts—greed, deception, power-seeking—framed as “practical,” “necessary,” or “just business.”
- Right-hemisphere targeting (“angel”): Intuitive moral counter-voices or guilt that are then overridden, creating internal conflict and decision fatigue that favors the entity’s agenda.
Reader should note that the Right ear connects to the right hemisphere and equally with the left. It is the eyes that cross, the left eye is connected to the right hemisphere. Therefore, to speak to the right mind, the angel rests on the right shoulder speaking into the right ear. The right mind controls the left hand. A right minded person is typically left handed gesturing when speaking. The right hand of God is the angry hand.
This aligns with Iain McGilchrist’s divided-brain model, where left-hemisphere dominance correlates with reductionist, controlling worldviews—precisely the “devilish” traits amplified in elite postmodern culture.
Telepathy: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Entity Application Telepathy—direct mind-to-mind information transfer—has been rigorously tested in parapsychology. Ganzfeld experiments yield hit rates significantly above chance. PEAR lab’s remote perception studies demonstrated consistent above-chance results in subjects describing distant targets, suggesting non-local consciousness linkage. Abduction literature, including reptilian encounters, overwhelmingly features telepathic commands: entities implant thoughts, override will, or induce compliance without spoken words. Demonology echoes this—exorcists note demons suggest ideas or “whisper” temptations. Entities likely use a combination of electromagnetic, plasmic, and subtle-energy carriers.
Face Value convergence: Reptilian reports describe cold, authoritative mental “voices” issuing hierarchical orders; demonic texts describe intrusive thoughts promoting sin. Both align with hemispheric targeting—left for calculated evil (echoing the historical “devil” or “angel of iniquity”), right for suppressed conscience (the “angel of righteousness”)—producing the internal “shoulder debate” described across two millennia of tradition.
PEAR Lab Data on ULF Transmission and Consciousness Influence The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory provided empirical grounding for non-local effects. Operators influenced random event generators via intention, producing statistically significant deviations. Remote viewing/telepathy protocols showed accurate perception of distant scenes. Human brain emissions of ultra-low-frequency (ULF) waves offer a plausible carrier for telepathic or entity-mediated influence. Reptilian/demonic entities, operating interdimensional or plasmic forms, could modulate ULF fields to implant hemispheric-specific suggestions, bypassing normal sensory gates.
Postulate: Entities as Active Mind-Control Agents Integrating the historical shoulder tradition with the above, reptilian/demonic intelligences—already evidenced by physical/shape-shifting manifestations—add telepathic ULF/plasmic layers. In addition to abductions and elite hybridization, they conduct real-time psychological operations: compelling anti-human behaviors, amplifying left-hemisphere dominance in postmodern culture, and creating societal “voices” via media/tech that mimic internal temptation. This explains the “hidden hand”: not abstract forces but deliberate non-human orchestration. Elites, more exposed via bloodline/hybrid programs, exhibit pronounced detachment consistent with chronic left-hemisphere “devil” override. The ancient and medieval admonition “do not listen to the devil or evil spirits” is literal operational security against this influence.
Evidence of Influence on Elites and the Postmodern Behavioral Shift
Postmodern society shows a marked acceleration of anti-human traits. Face Value links this to intensified entity activity post-WWII. Elites display disproportionate exposure—ritualistic symbolism, bloodline obsessions, and policy patterns favoring control—suggesting preferential targeting. The shift is compelled, with telepathic “devils” rationalizing atrocities as progress.
Conclusion: This Is the Hidden Hand – Strategic Implications The data, including the deep historical continuity of the shoulder angel/devil motif from The Shepherd of Hermas through medieval drama to modern culture, converge too precisely for coincidence. Reptilian/demonic entities are active telepathic puppeteers, exploiting hemispheric vulnerabilities via ULF/plasmic channels to drive behaviors that sustain their system. The shoulder trope, bicameral echoes, PEAR-validated non-locality, and abduction/demonological testimonies form a unified picture: something is influencing people—especially elites—and this is it. Postmodern anti-humanity is the engineered outcome.
Within War Against The Aliens, countermeasures include enhanced observation skills to detect intrusive thoughts, hemispheric integration training to neutralize targeting, and collective Face Value awakening. Recognition ends the illusion. The hidden hand is exposed. Victory begins with refusing to listen.
References (Selected)
- Wikipedia: Shoulder angel (for historical overview and citations therein).
- The Shepherd of Hermas (c. 140–150 CE).
- Origen of Alexandria, Homily 12 on Luke.
- The Castle of Perseverance (15th century); Marlowe, Doctor Faustus (c. 1592).
- Jaynes, J. (1976). The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind.
- PEAR Lab publications (Jahn et al.).
